Mauritania: Survivors of the “Passif humanitaire” demand truth and justice 29 years after the Inal massacre

28 November 2019

Lire la page en français

This November 28, 2019, Mauritania celebrates the anniversary of its independence from France. This date corresponds with another, less joyful, anniversary, that of the summary execution of 28 Afro-Mauritanian soldiers on November 28, 1990. Taking place at the Inal military base, this event is symptomatic of the gross human rights violations committed during the so-called "Passif humanitaire" period between 1989 and 1991.

Almost three decades later, victims and their relatives continue to suffer from the provisions of Act No. 93-23 of June 14, 1993 (the “Amnesty Law”), which grants amnesty to members of the security forces for any crimes they may have committed during the "Passif humanitaire".

On November 28, 2019, MENA Rights Group and the Cadre de Concertation des Rescapés de Mauritanie (CCR-M) requested that the Special Rapporteur on the promotion of truth, justice, reparation and guarantees of non-recurrence intervene with the Mauritanian authorities to ask them to solve the "Passif humanitaire". This approach revolves around a dozen testimonies from victims and their families which illustrate the scale and gravity of the violations which took place during this period.

Background of the “Passif humanitaire”

Since the late 1980s, the Mauritanian government, then led by Colonel Maaouya orld Sid'Ahmed Taya, has expelled more than 60,000 Mauritanians from the Halpulaar, Soninke and Wolof communities, known generically as "Afro Mauritanians." The expulsions took place during a period of border-tensions between Mauritania and Senegal and were followed by other human rights violations.

Between October 1990 and mid-January 1991, the authorities arbitrarily arrested approximately 3,000 Afro-Mauritanian soldiers accused of plotting a coup d'état. It is estimated that between 500 and 600 of them became the victims of summary execution, preceded by torture and incommunicado detention. Those who survived the torture were released between March and April 1991 under a presidential pardon.

Amnesty Law

Several victims and their families have tried to bring complaints before the national courts, but the latter have proved unsuccessful following the entry into force of the Amnesty Law. This legislation has been repeatedly denounced by the United Nations treaty bodies. In July 2019, the Human Rights Committee expressed concern that the Government had not considered amending the Amnesty Law.

Faced with the inaccessibility of domestic remedies, the complainants have had no choice but to turn to international jurisdictions. In 2000, a complaint was filed with the African Commission on Human and Peoples' Rights, which asked the Mauritanian authorities to "establish an independent investigation to clarify the fate of the disappeared persons, and identify the perpetrators of the violations" and to "ensure compensation for the widows and other relatives of the victims."

Complaints of torture have also been filed in Europe, particularly in France, against Ely Ould Dah, who was an intelligence officer at the Jreïda base between 1990 and 1991. On July 1, 2005, the Nîmes Assize Court sentenced him to 10 years imprisonment for directly committing, ordering and organizing acts of torture against Afro-Mauritanian soldiers in 1990 and 1991.

No full and complete reparation

The Mauritanian authorities claim to have rendered justice and awarded adequate reparations to the victims. However, this observation is not shared by the victims' associations, which believe that compensation measures cannot replace the right of victims and their families to an effective remedy.

On March 25, 2009, a collective prayer in memory of the victims was held in the city of Kaédi, acknowledging the violations which had taken place. Nevertheless, the truth about what happened during this period is still considered a national taboo, as recalled by the Special Rapporteur on contemporary forms of racism, racial discrimination, xenophobia and related intolerance.

There has never been a transparent investigation to establish the truth about the crimes committed, let alone prosecute the perpetrators. The bodies of victims of extrajudicial executions have never been returned to families who still do not have graves to gather around.

How to address the “Passif humanitaire”?

The joint communication from MENA Rights Group and the Cadre de Concertation des Rescapés de Mauritanie sets out a non-exhaustive list of measures designed to definitively solve the “Passif humanitaire”. These include repealing the amnesty law in order to establish the truth about the crimes committed, prosecuting those responsible, and the imposition of appropriate penalties. The authorities are also called upon to provide adequate compensation for all victims and their families, commensurate with the gravity of the violations and the damage suffered. However, the implementation of these measures will require real political will on the part of the Mauritanian authorities.

More on Country

Latest News